Tag Archive: Rugby World Cup


Latest IRB World Rankings

Wales move above England to claim 5th place. Normally I dismiss the IRB World Rankings as completely pointless, only of use for a bit of fan debate. But right now they are more important…in November they are used to decide the seedings for the next Rugby World Cup grouping.

Which means getting 4th spot, and so top seed in a group, is very important. To do that we need to realistically beat France in the last 6 Nations game, and then have a better summer/autumn than they do.

IRB World Rankings

As they stand after the latest round of games (27th of February 2012)

Position (last week) Member Union Rating Point
1(1) NEW ZEALAND 91.43
2(2) AUSTRALIA 87.99
3(3) FRANCE 85.06
4(4) SOUTH AFRICA 84.34
5(6) WALES 82.62
6(5) ENGLAND 81.34
7(7) ARGENTINA 80.28
8(8) IRELAND 79.44
9(9) TONGA 76.63
10(10) SAMOA 75.81
11(11) SCOTLAND 74.94
12(12) ITALY 73.33
13(13) CANADA 72.92
14(14) JAPAN 70.45
15(15) GEORGIA 69.32
16(16) FIJI 68.78
17(18) ROMANIA 65.79
18(17) USA 65.63
19(19) SPAIN 62.72
20(21) NAMIBIA 61.24
21(22) URUGUAY 60.47
22(20) RUSSIA 60.12



Cup In The Air, Feet On The Ground

Humility is an attribute that is getting rarer in contemporary professional sport. With football players refusing to play so they can get big money transfers and NFL MVPs obligated to say they are “going to Disneyland!” you are unlikely to see the best of the best refusing to celebrate or a last-gasp loser showing magnanimity.  

Part of the issue is that any major incident is replayed. Instantly. We all see it in super slow motion, from a vast spectrum of angles and voiced over by countless experts. We get our opinion and then retell it immediately. As the game is going on we are all discussing the occurrences in real time.

We also apply emotion. The sports broadcasting industry is propelled by preamble. A story has to be made out of every single instance. So when we force this industry to support itself with the fans’ desires and need for the story we are channelling one or two individuals further into the limelight. That pedestal is aligned with a mike and a camera. Say your piece…

Obviously in some cases God is thanked, because the big man took time out of his busy day to make it all go well for one man, but also there is talk of performance and the instances. “What did you make of it?” You. The guy in the centre of the incident. We focus on them, and as keyboards chatter and social networking sites whir away we are all confronted with a solitary image and a track of questions.

It is hard to be humble when heroes are made, then broken, instantly. It is also hard not to create monsters when there is a coliseum of baying fans screaming for new monsters to slay the old – ones we all conspired to create.

Are we not entertained?

Well if we are it is because the industry is juiced by emotion and we will attribute it to the individual stars, assuming that it burns within them. We create stars, but it is very rare we have a total package that is all things to all people. So they are forced to perform.

We love the post match interview. I’ll not lie about it. I hate the post match interview. Straight after a game is the worst time to talk to someone, because they cannot think clearly or objectively. They will be at their most emotional, though, and that is why we love it. Fair play to Warren Gatland after the semi-final. He showed composure, clarity and an unwillingness to blame the official outright or alienate his captain or kickers. He showed humility I did not think he possessed.

On the incident, Sam Warburton accepted his fate and went over to the touchline. He knew he had gotten a little over excited and letting go of Clerc was his problem. Sure it was likely a yellow card, but by the letter of the law it was also fair enough to say it could be a red. If the ref backs himself you cannot argue, and the Welsh skipper didn’t.  His coach didn’t blame the loss entirely on that, either. Both showed world sport how you react to a knock-back.

With the screaming horde, however, it will continue. It is one of ‘Those’ moments in sport. Like Zidane’s head butt or Usain Bolt’s World Championship false start. It happened, the sportsmen want to get past it, but the frenzied press and the yelping supporters need to get the story. They need the emotion and they need it to be talked over. For the star pushed into the light it is not 15 minutes of fame they have to endure but a week or so of fostered hysteria. A couple of days repeated copy on Sky Sports News and possibly a quiz show question. Then we all slope off, looking for our next fix.

You could say that this is why we have fewer men of humility. We dissect them publicly, analysing everything, and a slip-up is better copy than something virtuous. Saying you admire your opposition is much less interesting than refusing to shake their hand. Would anyone be as interested in boxing if there wasn’t the pantomime match-up beforehand?

The flipside of this is that we also have a handful of stars with longevity. Wilkinson will always be a story. Tiger Woods will forever be a story. To a lesser extent Phil Taylor or Ronnie O’Sullivan will always make headlines, if only for one week a year.

As a result of this we may actively try to make sportsmen something they are not. People forget how teeth-itchingly bad David Beckham was in front of a camera. He was a brand, though, so we had to put up with him learning his way over the last 15 years or so. Now he is bearable. In England it will be the same with Rooney.

So in Scottish rugby, with our perennial gallant loser tag, we have had an individual star, in Chris Paterson, that embodies our underdog status. We are quite humble, but it sticks out more because many others aren’t and because it is a culture of excuse. It is almost a default modesty until we win. Then we get carried away. With change, our franchise star will also change; it looks set to be Richie Gray. I just hope that with such brand recognition he begins to show more humility, because he is going to be out in centre much, much more.

As for the rest of the World Cup: Australia are out of the running, which may well humble Quade Cooper (which I doubt). England are gone, under a dark cloud, but the talk of their arrogance is over-discussed and analyzed by their own press. France showed some sportsmanship by letting New Zealand wear All Black for the final.

With regards to the hosts, though, it is time to show nothing but humility. They have led the way throughout the tournament, so it would be fitting if they did the same off the field right at the end. Rugby can still show that it is a uniting, caring force and with New Zealand finally recognising its one true global icon and winner, in ultimate team player Richie McCaw, the IRB could promote its best side and the true value of team sport. That would be the best result for the Rugby World Cup.


Copyright © 2011 Scottish Rugby Blog
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright.



Who To Pick for the Semis

It’s not the RaboDirect PRO12 on a week where BBC Alba has deserted you, or even the LV Cup (although that is on this weekend). Nope, no matter how hard you look, there is no Scottish involvement in the Rugby World Cup Semi-finals this weekend. Not even a touch judge to root for. So who are you going for? Here’s a little help.

Unless France perform miracles, it’s a fair bet the Webb-Ellis trophy will go somewhere with a lot of sheep. That said, it seems to me, clever person that I am, that there are 4 clear choices for you, the neutral, to throw your weight behind:

New Zealand

This lot could be quite Scottish, if recent experience of the country is anything to go by. Sadly though, Stephen Donald aside, Richie McCaw is the most Scottish name on display and with the amount of Williamses and an Ellis on the bench could have you thinking you were watching Wales.

Can the All Blacks finally lay their hoodoo to rest and claim the World Cup that has eluded them for, um, a while? I don’t know why they get so worked up about it, it’s only been going since 1987. The Lions haven’t won a test series in New Zealand since the 1970s. Scotland haven’t beaten New Zealand, ever. International Rugby’s been on the go since the 1870s, so what is there to get worked up about, really? Still, you can’t tell that to the Kiwis, who get nervier with each star player they lose. Now that the Aussies stand in the way of them and their shot at glory it gets even tougher to predict. They definitely have the form, but lost a bit of class with DC’s injury.

Pick them if: you think they “deserve it” after having failed to win it 5 times before, or for hosting it or something (total nonsense by the way) / you want the team that has played the best throughout the tournament to win / you like Piri Weepu’s beard.

Australia

If there’s one thing Quade Cooper likes more than a ridiculous side-step followed by a no-look pass behind his head it seems to be winding up New Zealanders (nation of his birth lest we forget). I suspect we’ll see the nasty throat-slitty Haka on Sunday like we did against France, most of it aimed at Cooper. Still, he hasn’t really backed it up so far on the field in the tournament, and Australia have got as far as they have by way of dogged defending rather than the mesmerising attack we were all expecting from their youthful back division – now ragged with injuries following a series of tough matches.You suspect though they would fancy a final victory if they could just polish off those pesky All Blacks. Look for one last big push.

Pick them if: you like dodgy haircuts paired with quality moustaches / you like showboating and not scrummaging / you don’t want the All Blacks to win.

France

Maxime Medard has more attacking spirit in his left sideburn than the England back division but so far the French backs have been shuffled by their coach or shackled by poor performances and failed to inspire much other than in the quarters. I’m not even sure the French believe that they are within midget-throwing distance of a World Cup final having lost to Tonga, but now that they are here and they have put their England hoodoo to bed I suspect they might come out to play. Wales like to throw the ball about too, and this could be an even better match than the Ireland one on paper if the French turn up like they mostly did against England.

Pick them if: you like free-spririted attacking rugby at it’s best – if they decide to do any of that / you like scrummaging, if they don’t / you want to see Mark Lievremont go out as befits his coaching tenure (bewildering) / you think they might show up against the All Blacks this time in the final and provide the greatest challenge.

Wales

After having lost a match to South Africa that they probably shouldn’t have but will now be glad they did, Wales are left carrying the torch for the Celts/The UK in the knockout stages. Second to the All Blacks, the Welsh are the team playing balanced rugby with a mixture of grunt up front, set-piece and attacking flair; all the elements in harmony. James Hook is their Quade Cooper and has been thrown in at fly-half to weave some magic, having been largely sidelined thus far following Priestland’s run of form. Luckily outside him Jamie Roberts has refound his Lions ’09 form and could offer a steadying hand. Might be worth cheering him on if only to see a Roberts/Nonu match-up in the final – two of the players of the tournament by some margin. Another mouthwatering matchup would be Warburton vs McCaw, but Wales’ young captain has got to get past Dusautoir first, also no slouch in the “Worlds’ Best Flanker” stakes.

Pick them if: you like underdogs / you want to show some celtic solidarity and want someone you can really get behind in the final / you don’t mind putting up with BBC 2 Wales commentators and Welsh internet pundits going on about it for the next, oh, eternity / you want Scotland to beat the World Champions in the Six Nations so we can have “unofficial World Champions” banners like the football Tartan Army do.

The Australia vs New Zealand match – which I reckon New Zealand will edge – may turn out to be the real final as all four sides may well exhaust themselves trying to go through, but try telling that to the Northern hemisphere teams.


Copyright © 2011 Scottish Rugby Blog
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright.



Lessons From South America

As I dragged myself out of bed at 6am yesterday to watch the World Cup Quarter finals, splashing warm tea on my face and enjoying a mug of bacon, I was surprised by some of what I saw. Actually, that is technically not true. I was more surprised by something that I heard.

The Australia and South Africa game messed with my head a little bit as the Antipodeans won, despite being in their own third for 75% of the game. However, I was not really that surprised that the breakdown reached disgraceful levels of competition: the southern hemisphere press at this World Cup have made a song and dance about how the SANZAR teams play free flowing, high scoring rugby. As this game was one car crash away from being a crime scene, referee Bryce Lawrence perhaps thought it was his duty to allow hands in at ruck time, so that more play could be strung together and turnover tries more likely?

The result of this was that David Pocock took it upon himself to try and pinch every ball that came near him. Sometimes it was magnificent and legal. Many times, though, it was a hand digging round the side or pouring over an additional man that had made it a ruck. Fair play to Pocock: he played the referee brilliantly and he must have the strongest torso in World rugby (as well as a face that can take a punch very well!).

As unlikely a victory as this was for Australia, however, it was not what surprised me. It was not even an instance or a statement in or about this game. No. It was something that happened, followed by something that was said, in the All Blacks versus Argentina game.

As that final Quarter Final played out us neutrals had to endure some snore inducing discussions about whether Colin Slade was good enough to replace his holiness Dan Carter. Indeed as Slade dropped a pass 5 minutes in that nearly led to a try for Argentina you could almost feel five million Kiwis willing an injury on him. With 35 minutes played, the shrunken Slade limped off, and someone else in Aaron Cruden, who still didn’t quite measure up to Dan, was tasked with stringing play together.

This was just preamble, though. It was still unremarkable. What surprised me in this game was actually the moment that Argentina scored. In fact it was the moment leading up to that score. Not because of the fact that New Zealand leaked a try, but because of the manner in which they leaked that try.

Before flanker Cabello pounced over the try line there was a break. No. 8 Leonardo Senatore picked from the base of a scrum and cruised past McCaw and Read into the dead zone between the back three and the stand-off. He made a B-line for the right-hand corner and as the commentator said something about being an “amateur” he was brought down, metres from the line.

I sat up.

Before I could process what I may have misheard the Argentines were whooping and cheering, delighted that they had broken the All Blacks and were in this game.

Was it true? Was Senatore a punter like me or you?

I did some quick research. Sure enough, the 6ft 2 no. 8 was listed as playing for hometown club Gimnasia y Esgrima (Rosario) on the official Pumas website. Although technically an amateur, with no big European team experience and a name few would know, he had streaked past men whose faces were probably on lunch boxes Down Under. In short, he fitted in.

This got my mind working. I checked the IRB website to see how many players were playing in Argentina, as well as how many kids. Nothing. No information courtesy of the IRB. I could not possibly guess at how far rugby was going, so I hit the blogs.

After about an hour and a half of reading several Argentinean blogs (some in broken English, some in my misGoogled, broken Spanish) I had gleaned that Argentina had about 100,000 players across all clubs, and 250 ‘elite’ players. There are currently no professional teams in Argentina.

Again this perplexed me. With the exception of the known stars in Europe Argentina had no pro rugby and 250 support players, of varying ability, to pick from and they still beat Scotland. A team that has had professionalism in some guise since 1997. Wow.

So I considered what lessons we in Scotland could learn from those in South America.

There club rugby is intricate, but it involves numerous steps up to siphon off the best players and ensure they play competitive rugby.

Each region of the vast country has their own Union. Some are stronger than others. With a population of roughly 40 million, huge poverty and an obsession with football it is obvious that there will be few rugby players as a result, in comparison to the population. Each of these Unions have their own club competition. Buenos Aires has the strongest of these competitions, but in order to keep up some of the other Unions combine to form better leagues, so, for example, the regions of Santa Fe, Rosario and Entre Rios all have one set of leagues, known as the Torneo Del Litoral. Buenos Aires, Córdoba and Tucumán all have their own regional competitions.

Moving on from this there is more competition for the better teams. From the Torneo Del Litoral the best four teams go on to play in the Torneo Del Interior alongside teams that qualify from the Noroeste, Centro, Noreste, Pampeana, Oeste and Patagónico leagues. Sixteen teams in total. Meanwhile, outside of this, in Buenos Aires their league runs alone as it is the most competitive. At the end of Bueonos Aires’ Torneo de la URBA and the Torneo Del Interior there is another step up.

The best two teams from both of these competitions go on to play each other in semi-finals, the winner of both competitions playing the runners-up of the other competition. The final match crowns the winner of Nacional de Clubs and the best team in Argentina. In November 2010 it was won by Hindú Club, perhaps Argentina’s most successful and well known team.

Now in Scotland we could say that with a smaller country we have less geographic issues to contend with and our best teams are already in our top league, playing each other regularly. “We don’t need to learn lessons from the Argentine set-up”. But the fact remains that a guy that has played in the Torneo Del Literal, moving from there to the Torneo Del Interior and perhaps onto the Nacional De Clubes has just run past Richie McCaw.

Do we have amateurs that could do this? Maybe, maybe not.

The truth is that our competitions are not nearly as gruelling as this. We also do not have the level of rep rugby that Argentinean amateurs can play. They have all the age grade teams, but they also have a competition for regional selects. Their Campeonato Argentino competition runs through March and April and eight regions play with their best players from the Interior and Nacional competitions. There is further promotion of the best players they have.

In the summer there was even greater exposure as the best players from that competition were selected to play for a Pampas XV that competed in the Vodacom Cup alongside Currie Cup teams. An ‘amateur’ team that won that entire competition. Many of that team ended up at the World Cup and in the Quarter Finals.

This we do not have. We have a British & Irish Cup for three teams, a half season Cup competition that is struggling to attract publicity and fans, and a two-game-programme for a Club International. The competition is differing and exclusive for three teams, and the amount of highest quality games is limited for the best players.

I will admit that after researching I was surprised at the system in Argentina. They did not throw themselves into professionalism like Scotland did. They have built things up. As a result they are producing international standard ‘amateurs’ and they are good enough to win against Currie Cup teams. Their national team is also entering the SANZAR competition, formerly the Tri-Nations, and they look like they have enough quality to support at least one Super Rugby franchise.

Things could be looking up for Argentine rugby, and there is a tiny gap between their best club players and their international stars. They have surprised me, but what can I learn from them?

Well until we at least try to emulate their District competition we will never have enough competition for our two Club International squads. We will also never have enough high-quality game-time for our promising kids. We also need more competition for those B&I Cup spots, so that the product we put into that competition is both competitive and a result of a gruelling process.

Argentina play very few international matches. Maybe, now we are 10th in the World, behind Tonga, and even less of a lucrative and attractive touring option to the top tier nations, we should become more insular with our rugby. At least that way we may have more hardened players for Edinburgh and Glasgow to choose from…


Copyright © 2011 Scottish Rugby Blog
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright.



World Cup Round Up

So that’s the trip of a lifetime over, and I’m home and back at the coalface. So what to make of Scotland’s World Cup campaign? Let’s take a look at the good, the bad and the ugly of New Zealand 2011 from our perspective.The Good:

  • Hey, we scored 4 tries against Romania, right?
  • Ruaridh Jackson settled right in to the Scotland 10 jersey. Joe Ansbro showed enough sparks in attack (when he was allowed to play) to suggest that Max Evans has been finally sent back to the wing. Unless Joe can play 12?
  • Ross Ford had a belter against England despite being tackled in all directions, often at the same time. Euan Murray (when he played) went to town on every scrum put in front of him.
  • Giant portions of amazing food. Special mention to the Fergburger in Queenstown and the Fat Dog in Rotorua for the quality of burger and sheer epic size of the plates of food they put out respectively.
  • The people of Invercargill and the whole of Southland for a truly warm welcome to Scotland players and fans. Dunedin? Where’s that? Who needs a roof anyway?
  • The scenery on South Island. Anyone who says New Zealand looks just like Scotland is going to the wrong bits. Staggering views, around every bend.
  • The atmosphere in the Cake Tin for the Argentina game. Flat out the most fun atmosphere pre-game, and the full 80 minute support and singing from the fans of both sides. The first time in ages I thought that we’d really done the team justice with our support.
  • Peter Breiner’s jaunty arrangement of Flower of Scotland that made it almost pleasant to listen to.
  • Banning people from bringing automobile parts into the stadium in Invercargill. It’s about time someone stamped out this despicable practice.
  • Samoan centre Eliota Fuimaono-Sapolu’s tweets, railing against IRB injustice and um, Nigel Owens. Shooting both barrels from the hip.
  • Ireland’s performance against Australia. Things are all set for Ireland’s best ever World Cup, or at least one where they do not underperform. Wales look handy too.

The Bad:

  • That ten minutes against Argentina.
  • That led to that ten minutes against England.
  • Nick De Luca, let’s face it, had a few howlers. Again. Lot of penalties given away and not much passing. He wasn’t helped by the speed refs are whistling up Holding On tournament wide. I don’t want to seem like I’m singling out Nick, who I think is a talented ball player, so I’ll also point out Parks was wildly inconsistent as usual. 2 restarts out on the full in the Romania match set the tone for an area of the game we didn’t really focus on, and paid for it. And he should have taken the contact, or passed out to 12, if he wasn’t ready for that drop. As A.D has already pointed out, big Richie and Barclay were also a little subdued, although the former wasn’t helped by heavy marking from opposition defences.
  • Robinson not selecting Lawson for the final game, or Ansbro in the third.
  • Jonny Wilkinson’s kicking.

The Ugly:

  • The way the smaller teams in the tournament were scheduled. Namibia in particular were shunted around, reputedly at the broadcasters’ whim. They were practically on the plane home before some teams had played 3 games.
  • We went out at the knockout stage for the first time, after 2 matches we should really have won. Still, as my mate Doug said after each of them, we didn’t score the tries, and they did.
  • Almost all of the rugby in Pool B, including a lot of the stuff played under a roof in perfect conditions.
  • Al’s tour moustache. In fact, mine was pretty ropey too.
  • The state of my credit card. For us poor Brits, New Zealand is expensive. Unless you want to buy steak at the Pak ‘N’ Save, then you’re quids in. Still, it was worth it.
  • Most of the official RWC merchandise. While there was a massive amount more choice than in France, a lot of it seemed aimed at the older fans, shall we say. Where were the cool t-shirts? Rugby World Cup belt anyone? And how come the England supporters shirt was navy blue (and there wasn’t a Scotland one)?
  • Mike Tindall’s nose. How any sort of mystery blonde could be interested in that, is in itself a mystery.
  • New Zealand’s lack of love for Colin Slade. Surely they can win the big one without Dan? Nonu could probably beat Argentina by himself. After all, they’ve already beaten France and everyone else is playing rubbish Northern Hemisphere rugby, eh.

We might not be involved in the knockout stages, but there are some fascinating match-ups to keep an eye on while dreaming about what might have been.

Still, there’s nothing like the RaboDirect Pro12 to bring you back down to earth.


Copyright © 2011 Scottish Rugby Blog
This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only.
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. If this content is not in your news reader, it makes the page you are viewing an infringement of the copyright.



The Aftermath

So how do we summarise our Rugby World Cup?

In order to be as impartial as a slighted Scot can be, I would strive to review this World Cup on its merits. I would not make grandiose comments about the state of our game at home just yet. Not before I do some more research, at least! Our obvious structural flaws will be laid bare in a few days…

Firstly I would like to say that some of our travelling party performed admirably. As a fan (which I cannot deny I am) I am fiercely proud of some of our performers. Jackson has come on a great deal and will continue to improve. He will grow into international games and with the familiarity of pressure a kicking game could sprout. I am also pleased with the way Kelly Brown led from the exile of 6. He is a physical and domineering presence, without saying too much. Also, despite his inherent flaws, Sean Lamont led a lot of Scottish play.

In support of these key men I felt Vernon and Ansbro did what was asked of them, when it was asked of them, and without fanfare. Allan Jacobsen is as consistent a performer as I have seen and Euan Murray and Ross Ford turned it on when it mattered. Ross Rennie has a right to feel aggrieved at how much game time he ended up getting, considering his performances and Max Evans looked dangerous when he got the bit between his teeth.

In the backroom, too, there were some great jobs done. Massimo Cuttitta gets a lot of stick, but after an embarrassing display against Romania we did well in the scrum in the rest of the games and were on top for most of the game against England. The Italian must surely get some credit for this.

In this vein of turnaround analyst Gav Scott must also get a mention. Scotland did not make the same mistakes twice in consecutive games (OK, there were kick-off receptions against Argentina and England which killed us, but that comes down to individual concentration because, honestly, there’s not a chance in hell that wasn’t highlighted!) and we had the right approach against Argentina and England to close down their key players in open play.

The medical team did well to ensure that Scotland had no need to fly in additional players.

Then, however, we come to those that disappointed.

Barclay and Gray were the big ones for me. Perhaps not dropped because they had been pulled out of rugby halfway through last season to focus on this World Cup, they played a lot of minutes but never really met the standards many have come to expect from them. Perhaps expectations were what nullified them, but they were certainly not Scottish protagonists.

In the middle of the park it was also fairly obvious that Morrison was not at the level of performance needed to punch through defences and control the back-line defence. He was not at the level he was a year ago. He is now also too old to change. On the other side of the coin De Luca, who did some nice things in his showings against Argentina and England, is far too erratic a player and may never reach a level of consistency or indeed play a complete single test match.

Loyal servant Parks and Paterson must now –in my opinion, of course –be allowed to finish their careers without the body damaging prospect of test rugby stretching out ahead of them. Parks did well to turn himself around and had a great 6N in 2010. Paterson has achieved so much and should be allowed to return home to deafening applause and a place in the Scottish Hall of Fame. It is, however, time to remould Scotland in a new image.

Which brings me to the coaches.

The squad that boarded the plane was probably the right one. There were few arguments with this. However between the first two games Scotland made 11 changes. The next game saw 5 changes and then 6 for England. That is a total 22 changes for 3 games. That is a mind-boggling inconsistency of selection, particularly when there was a huge change between playing Argentina and then England. There was a 6 day turnaround. The players would have recovered sufficiently in that time for a Pool decider.

This begs the question: was that our best team against Argentina? Was that our best team against England? If the answer was yes to one of those then some serious questions have to be asked about why there was no parity of selection when we were playing two top 10 international teams.

Maybe we grossly underrated Argentina. They lost some key players but beat us. However, it was ultimately Andy Robinson’s decision to make all of those changes and his squad rotation backfired. Sure make some changes from Romania to Georgia. 4 days is horrific as a turnaround. But to change between Argentina and England seems senseless. Almost rotation for rotations sake.

After the England game there was a moment where Robinson’s resolve appeared to have shattered. He looked tired. He looked heart-sick. He talked of being proud of what he had achieved with Scotland and was philosophical about the future. Now he says he wants to stay on, and I think he should. It makes sense as he is contracted until 2015, but also because one wonders what he could achieve if he was given four years to mould a new team and continue his message. The players clearly respect him.

As for his assistant, Gregor Townsend, it is perhaps time to say Thank You, but Goodbye.

Paterson was quoted last week as saying that Townsend always said that Scotland needed to score tries to be successful. He had no experience coaching teams how to score tries, and he hasn’t picked any up with Scotland. We haven’t scored in 3 games.

Wales call upon Wasps’ Shaun Edwards and Rob Howley once held dual positions with the Cardiff Blues and Wales. All of Ireland and England’s staff have previous coaching experience. Perhaps Scotland can follow a Welsh example and employ someone who also holds a similar position with a pro side or, less likely, a director of rugby to be our Attack/Backs coach?

If we, as I think we should, try to reshape the national team into a completely new beast without Parks, Paterson and maybe even Morrison I would like to see us do so with a finished style in mind. This could be done by someone with experience of doing this and experience of coaching regularly at an intense level. Also, Townsend was famed for being a creative and unpredictable individual. We don’t need players like that, we need a team. A team that moves together and has an understanding of itself. We need to find that from somewhere else.

 This World Cup is officially the worst we’ve ever had. You can run and run but you’ll never get away from this fact. A former pro coach said to me earlier today that we all got carried away with some one-off results we’d had in the few years leading up to this tournament. It is over now and we must be critical and fair with our analysis. We must also move forward, utilising Robinson’s coaching ability and giving him better tools.

We have 4 years to rebrand and reshape Scotland. We need a new approach, but the same driving force. A team consistency with a fresh ethos. It sounds hard, but look at what Ireland have achieved since 2003. It is doable…



England And Scotland: Pt 3

As the first 2 parts have stated, England have a pack with runners, a midfield that can crash and whippets out wide.  Scotland have picked a team with a need and runners of their own. They have abrasion and risk in equal measure in their selections.

Scotsmen think they can win this. Englishmen have an expectation to win. Alex Ferguson himself thinks Scotland have a chance. We will all be watching and wondering.

So as it is, frankly, impossible to tell if this game will be close, a rout or an 8 point victory I have come up with how the game would pan out if it was played in my head. Yeah. That dark, scary place…

Anthems: Scotland, backed by boisterous support and a few extra Kiwis, roar into the ‘Flower’ and shake Eden Park to its very foundations. ‘God Save the Queen’, in comparison, is sung at an adequate pace and with a noise level acceptable to Johnno’s ears. Robinson doesn’t take part.

Kick-Off: Wilkinson lofts the ball (a regulation ball, that we are assured hasn’t been tampered with) into the air. Scotland claim it well enough, but run through 6 phases without making much headway. Jackson kicks it out and some mumblings start already that this will be a game of bosch and nudge.

Minute 4: Disaster strikes. 40m out Lamont tears out of the line to try and annihilate Wilkinson –which he does –but the OBE flicks a cute pass to Ashton who runs it in and delivers a cripplingly irritating Swan Dive. Wilkinson nails the kick.

Minute 5: Paterson chips in with a relatively simple kick to keep us close.

Minute 22: Strokosch delivers a monstrous hit on James Haskell, causing a flare up. Moody steps in to cool things down, but not before Thompson attempts to kiss as many Scots as possible.

Minute 29: Croft returns the favour chasing a kick and smashing Max Evans, who spills it forward into touch. The resulting scrum, much like the rest of the game is more even than many commentators would have expected and Murray gives Matt Stevens a hard time.

Minute 35: Jackson shakes off some tacklers to get closer to the line –“was that an offside, Ref?”- and feeds an Evans who hobbles through a gap as Tuilagi shoots in with another big hit. Paterson creeps into the pocket and slots a drop goal few had expected him to take on. 7-6.

Half-Time: More handbags ensue and the rain starts tumbling down. The ref blows the whistle and both captains get into the sheds early, hoping to get their teams to calm down. The ITV coverage is as grim as before, but the analysis is lightened up by images of England’s dressing room where they are clearly getting an earful from Johnno. Wilkinson, in particular, seems to be getting it tight about his kicking out of hand. Flood is trying not to look up, and a face peels round the toilet door just out of view. Surely England wouldn’t sneak suspended Dave Alred into the dressing room…

Kick-Off: The game restarts and it is as heated as before. Mauls break out from the English and Croft looks more and more wasted as he and Lawes take up wide positions, but aren’t hit.

Minute 44: England give away another penalty, proving that under pressure they can commit atrocious amounts of infringements. The crowd sense it too. As it is further out Jackson takes it on confidently. He drills it through just as cameras catch Johnson slamming his fists on the desk and making for the door.

Minute 60: Scotland are tackling like dervishes, but they are also running into brick walls in attack. They are often stringing 8 phases together. Eventually, though, the referee has had enough and yellow cards Deacon for persistent team offences.

Minute 73: Deacon is back on, but now Youngs has been carded for the same reason. From a ruck Cusiter, on for Blair, chips over the top 22m out and Evans races through to touch down. 11-7 to Scotland and then Jackson makes the kick. 13-7! There is little time to catch breathe. Despite this Robinson fights the urge to chuck on the subs.

Minute 75: The defence is really firing at this point. To a man Scotland are pushing forward and hitting anything in white. Barclay looks close to vomiting, but he won’t stop screaming in the line. Flood and Foden are moaning as they can’t get any ball, particularly in space. Hartley is on for Thompson but he is struggling to keep his cool as Ansbro cuts out a menacing, drifting run from Armitage. It may stay like this…

Minute 78: Rennie is on for Strokosch who couldn’t run anymore and the Edinburgh man charges down a kick from Flood. Vernon chases after it and catches Ashton with the ball 10m from his own line. The England team look flustered and they resort for pick and goes.

Minute 80: The Ball is cleared 15m out from the line and Scotland have one last chance. They recycle the ball, and Mike Blair is forced to step into contact. A few phases lead to forwards rumbling and the ball ends up in Lamont’s hands at first receiver but he retains it. Jackson is behind the ruck…I feel sick….Did he slot that?!!

After Match analysis: Neither side is available for comment. There is confusing everywhere. Even Tindall’s harem of paparazzi are at a loss. Robinson is still wandering around the pitch somewhere. This should make things interesting, huh? Did you see that…?!



England And Scotland: Pt 2

In an effort to show a genuine response from a genuine guy, I have not altered this in any way. This is an email I got from Berni Stortoni at the start of the week:

“Hi Alan,
Well now everyone in Argentina is very happy with the team. The effort that the players did it during the game was excellent.
I think Scotland lost the chance to close the game in the first 20′ in the second half.
Now I hope Scotland beat England!!!!”

In four sentences this ex-Warrior has summed up what happened on Sunday. Scotland missed their chance to put themselves straight through to the Quarter Finals against a hard working but unglamorous South American side. Now we all live in hope.

Despite the incessant reports of what Scotland need to do; to rely on; to expect, we have a clear objective. An objective perhaps clearer that any we have had during this World Cup campaign. We need to beat the Auld Enemy by a minimum of 8 points.

Sure we could hope Georgia pull one out of the fire and smoke an Argentinean side that is bruised and held together at the seams by sticky tape and Felipe Contepomi’s force of will. We could hope that Gorgodze continues his devastating rampage in this tournament and takes out Contepomi, Lobbe and Ledesma. He won’t, though, and I doubt we can rely on results elsewhere. Scotland need to stick to the plan. Focus on our objective.

There are many possible permutations in this pool, but the intention must be made clear. The team Robinson has picked certainly has an air of ‘Last Chance Roll’ about it, but that last chance lasts 80minutes. The team cannot worry itself with notions of blistering bonus tries, because we forget what is at hand. A game of phases.

In front of Scotland strides an England team naming its most dynamic back-row available, as well as Courtney Lawes. In the backs they have the much hyped, but frustratingly potent wildcard, Manu Tuilagi. Behind him there is a back-three that bookmakers are struggling to lengthen in odds to score. This team is full of direct, assertive and varied runners.

Strangely, though, to England’s detriment the men manning their rudders, Wilkinson and Thompson, are selected again despite struggling to recapture the spirit of ’03. Martin Johnson does not underestimate their talismanic properties, but he is certain to use Flood and Hartley in the last 3rd/4er of the game. He will leave nothing to chance.

Scotland, on the other hand, are banking on chance.

Against Argentina we lost a game at the death. Our clunking control was bypassed by a dancing full-back, and we lost it for the end minutes. We must recapture that control –something I am now sure Ruaridh Jackson is capable of –and let our own runners run…away from contact areas.

The team we have picked is full of running, too. The selections of Vernon, Lamont at 12 and Danielli and Evans means that we could counter attack at the fringes. It also offers offload runners at staggered positions on the pitch. Defensively, too, it has more of a feel of Scrammblers (although there will be a programmed defender, probably Strokosch or Barclay, who will filter in behind Lamont who will have licence to fly at Tuilagi or Tindall).

Don’t misinterpret, please. The defence will be one of pressure and constant waves between the 15m lines. This represents the biggest game in almost all of these players’ lives. The tackling will be robust and the bodies sacrificed. It is just that with Vernon, Barclay and Strokosch, Danielli, Evans, Paterson and Lamont we look set fair to retreat in haste should England spring a half-break. Staging a shutout, for the objective.

Up front Strokosh, Gray, Kellock, Ford and Murray will be expected to chew dirt, make tackles and spoil play. They will be made to man the collisions as if Johnson himself was barking orders through a bullhorn at the back of each contact. Be alert, be physical.

The good thing is that now, once any permutations are forgotten and the build-up work ignored we are still just left with that recognition: it is all or nothing. Remember the objective, remember the roles. Remember the hits.

Remember the objective.

After this game a lot of analysis may come down to how Kellock fared against a ferocious and rested Lawes. Credence may be paid to how Blair moved with Youngs. Experts may marvel at the outcome of Lamont’s gambling shots out of the defensive line. We may all rue not setting out to find a bonus point against Georgia. Should Rory Lamont have had more time on the pitch? Speculation will happen immediately after the game.

Whatever the lines and whatever the outcome, however, Scotland will still have offered an answer to a simple question about hope and a need for victory.

Did we deliver on the Objective?



England And Scotland: Pt 1

Pete South from RugbyFanCast gives us his views on tomorrow’s titanic clash from an English perspective..:

And so, three teams remain in Pool B. Georgia and Romania have huffed and puffed, and threatened to blow the houses of England and Scotland down, but now both teams are consigned to four years in the wilderness before the bright light shines on them once more.

Georgia can still leave their mark on the group; a shock victory would do nicely for both England and Scotland, but in truth their spirit left this tournament some time ago. Having won what both they and Romania admitted was the only game worth getting fired up for, Georgia will take to the field against the Pumas knowing there is little more they can do, nor is there anything more expected of them.

The Georgian Prime Minister turned up for one match, and one match only. Can you guess which one?

So that means that the onus lies with either Scotland or England to grasp the thorny rose or thistle. Scotland must claim their biggest ever win over the old enemy in 25 years while England must do one thing; avoid defeat. 

But that isn’t everything riding on a game that counts for everything. Nick De Luca picked and poked at old wounds when he suggested that the sweet icing on the cake of qualifying from the group stages would come with English embarrassment.

“No matter who we were playing this weekend, it could be – it hopefully won’t be – our last game in the World Cup.” The centre said. “If we do it right, England would go out, which would be an added bonus, but it’s not the incentive itself.”

There is no doubt that either side would get a little kick of Schadenfreude from the misery of the other, but De Luca is embarking along a particularly dangerous path that could lead to bullet being lodged in his foot with a smoking pistol clenched in his hand.

In a game of such significance for both teams, there can be little room for sentiment or emotion, or at least emotion channelled in the wrong direction; baiting an opponent through patriotism, genuine dislike or just through mischievousness can easily backfire. 

Introducing sub-plots and added elements to a game which has the importance of a World Cup winner-takes-all match complicates and takes the eye off what is important; just ask Warren Gatland. His outburst against Dylan Hartley before the 6 Nations curtain raiser between Wales and England provided England with enough ballast to take their rivals to the cleaners. He banned himself from doing any pre-match interviews for the rest of the tournament after he provided England with motivational material.

Not that De Luca’s comments were anywhere near the level of Gatland’s, he speaks only the truth. But the rivalry between these two is obvious. Both teams are aware of it and the importance of it, and De Luca need not set a see-saw in motion that he might not be able to control – such games are built upon controlling and suffocating errors and mistakes. There is certainly such thing as being too fired up.

Scotland have a good record against England away from Twickenham – in fact for the last game England won away from HQ you have to go back to 2004. 

Having hinted at what they are capable of, Scotland must take something of a two footed leap into the unknown in their biggest game of the tournament. Despite being on top for much of the game against Argentina, they were unable to rely upon a moment of brilliance like the one Lucas Gonzalez Amorosino produced.

Now against England they must light the fire than has only so far sparked intermittently. This will of course be a tight game played out most likely through the pack. Neither side will want to take a risk with so much at stake (much like the Argentina game) but now Scotland must look to ensure that the moment of brilliance comes from a man in a deep blue shirt this time.

Max Evans has hinted at an ability to run the ball with some success, but he must show more. If the forwards can provide a platform or England repeat their penalty-prone antics of games gone by, then the stage is his to be the difference.

You never know, De Luca may see his replacement become the scythe to match the blunt, brute force of his country’s forwards. If so, then he can taunt England all he wants, safe in the knowledge that retribution or revenge is some way off and not a couple days away.

In a few hours I will post my reposte…



Falling Off The Summit

Welcome to the precipice. In front of you is a sharp drop. A fall from grace. Behind you is a queue of people waiting to push you off. That same queue of people that always said Scottish rugby wasn’t very good. You always ignored them. Hoping that the glory days would return. Now you have to listen to their deafening chant and you can’t fight the urge to look down…

At the weekend Scottish rugby had to take a look at itself. After results like the ones we had on Friday, Saturday and Sunday things are looking bleak. If Scottish rugby was a TV show it would be on hiatus by Wednesday. However, the show, no matter how patchwork and ill-motivated its cast will now be, must go on.

In high performance sport there is an onus on review. Even semi-professional clubs in Premier One use video analysis. We must see where, when and why things went wrong.

The issue with this is that everyone in the country, including those at the SRU, know what the problems are. Edinburgh and Glasgow have no money and a limited playing pool to select from. The national team have even more of a shallow pool to pick from. We only really have 4 props, 2 hookers and 3 second rows good enough for International rugby. We only have a couple of wingers, a few centres, 2 full-backs and –judging by Dan Parks’ fairly selfish excuses, and his woeful decision to kick rather than take contact in the dying minutes of the game –only have one stand-off able to run a game.

This may seem harsh but the truth is that as a nation we can only call on a certain number of players, and a lot of them are not good enough for test match rugby.

During the game against Argentina, though, we could have won the game. I will never say we should: if we should we would have. Talk of offsides and slowed ball is infantile, though, because in a performance driven sport we are fully aware that if Dan Parks took contact instead of opting to swipe his left foot at the ball we could have set up a ruck and continued to work. Furthermore, and most importantly, we would not have needed to kick points in the dying minutes if players like Chris Paterson and Jim Hamilton had made their tackles on Amorosino.

The try was not a moment of magic. It was three or four moments of sloppiness from the Scottish defence.

So why should this hurt so much? Argentina are ranked higher than us in World Rankings and were 3rd at World Cup 2007. Well, it hurts because it shows us two things: 1) That the players that are good enough to play Test rugby were certainly good enough to win on Sunday and; 2) Scotland must now start planning for a complete rejuvenation of its rugby.

I felt that, on Sunday, Andy Robinson made some terrible decisions. He took off a Ruaridh Jackson who was finally growing into a Test player, and put on Dan Parks. He also removed captain and vice-captain Rory Lawson and Ross Ford. By the time Kelly Brown left the field, injured, none of the key decision makers that had started the game were able to impact on proceedings as Scotland went down to a weaving try.

I have no doubts in my mind that if Jackson was on instead of Parks he would have taken contact as Contepomi rushed out of defence. I also feel that if we had substituted Chris Paterson 20mins into the second half, as he was kicking possession away rather poorly and had knocked on, and had Ansbro starting at 13 we would not have missed the tackles on Amorosino. Instead we let Argentina win.

Andy Robinson has done many great things for the team since coming in, but in reality his record is no better than his predecessor’s. Brian Moore once said of Robinson that he was a great coach but a terrible selector. We saw the truth in this statement on Sunday. He does, however, have a long-term contract and he and Graham Lowe have a huge few years ahead of them.

At the moment Scotland need to beat 6N champions England. A team that only conceded four tries during that tournament. We also need a favour from Georgia or for us and Argentina to win heavily. It is a massive ask. Scotland have made an Everest for themselves from a game they were winning by 6 points, 72 minutes in.

If we fail –which I would never say is a certainty –we must face facts. It would be our worst ever showing as a nation and Robinson would have led us to that. At home we would be faced with two pro sides that had lost to two Italian teams. One coach, Lineen, has already said to me that he has had to deal with kids and a new team every season. The other had allegedly admitted to a group of coaches in the summer that the way Edinburgh play and with their personnel they are either set up to thrill or to take a hammering.

There needs to be a plotted course for our sport. Mark Dodson, Lowe and Robinson have an unenviable task of trying to salvage Scotland. We need to find more players. Better players. We need to make them. If we create great youth players we have the chance to nurture competition when we reach the international level. Our great white hope Mark Bennett has severely damaged his knee whilst in France with Clermont Auvergne but we are capable of producing exciting talent. We just need more.

For the team out there just now we need a performance greater than any we have seen from Scotland in the last four years. We need to take the right decisions and be brave with them. That counts for the coach, too.

We need to conquer England or we will fall off the International map.



Half-Baked at the Cake Tin

Wellington is a brilliant city, and the Westpac Stadium is – despite it’s fat oval shape and exposure to the elements in places – a brilliant place to go and watch a game of rugby. Sadly yesterday we didn’t get the brilliant game that the fantastic (if not capacity) crowd deserved.

It’s difficult to know what went wrong, and I’m sure A.D will pick over it having seen the game in detail on the TV, but it has left Al and I here in New Zealand with a cruelly deflated sense of what this Scotland team can achieve.

It now looks unlikely that we will progress to the knockout stages without knocking more tries past England than we have in several years, and without Argentina also failing to beat an underwhelming Georgia team who must play on Wednesday then again on Sunday. In short, mission failure looms large.

For quite some time we have been (or I have) steadfast in my position that if the current group of players clicked, we could do anyone some damage to anyone (except the All Blacks). So far, the performances we have seen have just asked the question: what if we really are not much better than Georgia? Should we accept our place in the rugby pecking order? Maybe De Luca never will capitalise on his promise. Maybe Mossy can’t tackle after all. Maybe Dan Parks really is rubbish at kicking with his left foot.

Anyway, enough negativity, I am sure you get your fill of that in the press. Over here the papers marvelled at the tenacity and passion of the occasion while acknowledging the rugby was not of the highest order. I think it was probably the best Scotland crowd I have seen though, who didn’t go flat once – as so often happens when greeted with a poor effort on the pitch – and matched the Argentinians (who may have outnumbered us) song for song and cheer for cheer till the bitter and tense ending.

There was also a heavy local contingent cheering on one side or the other and entering into the spirit of it with home-made kilts or pale blue and white face paint. “Never mind,” they say, “just beat the English. Please.” almost without exception. But really there is only one colour for them, lurking beneath the surface of any temporary affection for a foreign team.

After the big game on Saturday they are finally daring to believe this might be the All Black year after all. France were all over the place as usual but the All Blacks in places played what can only be described as the very best sort of rugby, and that which truly deserves trophies.

And really, that is what you come to a World Cup to see, even if it’s on a big screen on a windy pier in Wellington, the beers cost $7.50 for a 330ml can and you were cheering for France… wouldn’t miss it for the world.



Half-Baked at the Cake Tin

Wellington is a brilliant city, and the Westpac Stadium is – despite it’s fat oval shape and exposure to the elements in places – a brilliant place to go and watch a game of rugby. Sadly yesterday we didn’t get the brilliant game that the fantastic (if not capacity) crowd deserved.

It’s difficult to know what went wrong, and I’m sure A.D will pick over it having seen the game in detail on the TV, but it has left Al and I here in New Zealand with a cruelly deflated sense of what this Scotland team can achieve.

It now looks unlikely that we will progress to the knockout stages without knocking more tries past England than we have in several years, and without Argentina also failing to beat an underwhelming Georgia team who must play on Wednesday then again on Sunday. In short, mission failure looms large.

For quite some time we have been (or I have) steadfast in my position that if the current group of players clicked, we could do anyone some damage to anyone (except the All Blacks). So far, the performances we have seen have just asked the question: what if we really are not much better than Georgia? Should we accept our place in the rugby pecking order? Maybe De Luca never will capitalise on his promise. Maybe Mossy can’t tackle after all. Maybe Dan Parks really is rubbish at kicking with his left foot.

Anyway, enough negativity, I am sure you get your fill of that in the press. Over here the papers marvelled at the tenacity and passion of the occasion while acknowledging the rugby was not of the highest order. I think it was probably the best Scotland crowd I have seen though, who didn’t go flat once – as so often happens when greeted with a poor effort on the pitch – and matched the Argentinians (who may have outnumbered us) song for song and cheer for cheer till the bitter and tense ending.

There was also a heavy local contingent cheering on one side or the other and entering into the spirit of it with home-made kilts or pale blue and white face paint. “Never mind,” they say, “just beat the English. Please.” almost without exception. But really there is only one colour for them, lurking beneath the surface of any temporary affection for a foreign team.

After the big game on Saturday they are finally daring to believe this might be the All Black year after all. France were all over the place as usual but the All Blacks in places played what can only be described as the very best sort of rugby, and that which truly deserves trophies.

And really, that is what you come to a World Cup to see, even if it’s on a big screen on a windy pier in Wellington, the beers cost $7.50 for a 330ml can and you were cheering for France… wouldn’t miss it for the world.



Richie Vernon Rugby World Cup Tour Diary Pt 4

Our week in Wellington started in a pretty relaxed manner.

After travelling Thursday morning after the Georgia game, we were given the travel day and the Friday after to relax and have a look around the Capital. This was thankfully received by the squad after the quick turnaround to the Georgia game which was undoubtedly a hugely physical encounter, especially for the forwards. There were a few activities organised for us if we wished to go. A few headed on a Wellington tour involving the chance to see a few locations used for The Lord of the Rings movies, a few signed up for a fishing trip which was unfortunately cancelled but most, in truth, chose to stay in the hotel and have a few games of cards to decide who would buy the coffees for that morning.

Saturday we were back to work in preparation for the Argentina game which after the way the results have gone so far, will prove to be vital for both teams’ bid to progress to the quarter finals. Days off on tour often come with a sting in the tail when you get back to training and this was the case over the weekend with conditioning games and some physical defensive work being the focus over the two sessions. Saturday was also a chance to get back into the gym to keep the strength going after the foundations laid in preseason. ‘Pottsy’ our conditioner, was right at home in the ‘bodyworks’ gym he chose, which catered mainly for power lifters and competitive strongmen. The music was angry, the gym was dirty and adorned with pictures of bodybuilders and the gym itself was full of lifters in shorts a bit too tight for them. However it did have everything we needed and was full of people serious about lifting weights so it was an ideal place to train for us.

The rest of the week followed a similar theme. We trained Monday, Wednesday, Thursday with the Tuesday and Friday off to ensure we were as fresh as possible for what will be our toughest challenge so far here against an Argentina team who know it’s their last chance. On Wednesday the team was announced to the squad and the mood was very tense. Lots of players really put their hand up for selection in the way they played against Georgia and were rewarded with a start. I don’t envy the coaches as there were many hard decisions to make as it seems you could make an argument for any of the 30 to be starting. A few in particular were very unfortunate not be selected but all have taken the news well as the atmosphere in the camp has been very positive. There has been a real collective focus in training to do all the prep we can for the game and the non-22 have helped a huge deal in simulating the way Argentina play. Of course I would rather be starting but Ally, and Kelly, have played superbly and I will be looking to make a real positive impact off the bench in what will most likely be a close game.

Today we had our team run at the Westpac. It is a great stadium and will be a perfect venue to play. Having played there for the Wellington 7s a couple of times, I was reminded of the important role the wind can play on the game here. The wind really gusts here and the ball can move very strangely in the air so it was good to get a chance to catch a few high balls as this is a tactic we know Argentina use well. The boys have been in a relaxed and determined mood. All of us realise quite how important a game this is and we’ve been reminded a few times that the Pumas knocked us out of the last World Cup and a lot were involved in that game 4 years ago.

 Sunday we will be looking to avenge that loss and with all the Scotland shirts and kilts that have flooded into the city in the last few days I’m sure we will have great support in the stadium to do that. Let’s hope they enjoy the game and have something to celebrate afterwards!



Wishing Scotland All The Best

Here at Scottish Rugby Blog HQ we wondered: what would we say if we had the chance to give the Scotland Team a private message before the Argentina game?

Would we give them a Jim Telfer style roasting, or would we caress their egos? Would we go around the room speaking to each individual or roar about the passion of a nation? It is a tough one and in the end we thought we would rather ask other people what they would say…

…and wouldn’t you believe it! Some proud Scots gave us their message and we put it on YouTube. Right here!

Enjoy the clips and if you have a message for the lads either post it here, post it on YouTube under the video or make your own video and post it on twitter with the hashtag #MessageForScotland.

Look out Argentina!



Argentina Talk The Talk

“I’m really looking forward to this game – I think it’s going to be very close and hard to predict. Argentina have played well in both their first two games, and it was very pleasing to show against Romania that there’s more to our game than power and a strong set-piece. We will need to play well in all these areas against Scotland, because they are tough up front and have a number of good strike runners behind the scrum. It should be a very absorbing game.”

 Glasgow utility back Federico Aramburu is looking forward to the game against Scotland, despite being submersed in Caledonian surroundings, and there is a sense that everyone associated with Argentina may be growing in confidence. The players actually at this World Cup are starting to talk with increased frequency and, more significantly than this, they seem to believe it.

They have lost a game but it was against England and they accrued a bonus point for finishing within 7 points. Then they hammered Romania. They have 2 bonus points to our 1 and have shown their backs can cut loose. They have also been said to be focussing on the forwards in training. The weathermen expect dewy conditions.  

Argentina are known for their humble approach and likeable veteran players; guys who have climbed up out of Argentina and made it big in Europe, signifying longevity. Ledesma (38), Scelzo (35), Roncero (34) and Contepomi (34) are all known around the world. They have also shown that the little known guys like Amorosino and Bosch can play tidy rugby, as much as a Contepomi or a Hernandez. They suddenly seem to have more depth than we had previously assumed.

On top of this these humble men with expectant compatriots, a competition history and a sense of steady improvement have us firmly in their sights. The 2 losses to Scotland in Argentina last year have been expelled from the mind. Indeed they are making a point of telling us this.

“Both games are in the past, we are now focused on the present and this week’s game against Scotland,” Martin Scelzo told the Daily Mail.

“They are a very good team and have improved a lot since those games and they beat us in the last two games. Next Sunday is our chance for revenge against them and we will try to win. It is a big game for us,” Gonzalo Camacho told BBC Scotland.

“It is our most important game in the last four years, so will take the game as a final and we expect to win,” Marcelo Bosch agreed.

Fittingly, then, the last word must go to the talismanic Felipe Contepomi. He is many things: Doctor; Joker; mercurial talent. One thing is for sure, though. He is willing to destroy his body for Argentina and expects the same commitment from the rest of Los Pumas. So when he issues that, “I’m truly confident in all members of the team. If I’m fit to play, I will play. If I’m not, I’m sure we will still be competitive,” you know Argentina are ready for this game.

How do the Scots counteract an opponent growing in confidence and prepared to talk about it? Sometimes you can get caught up in what an opponent is saying; how the build-up climbs. Searching for motivation can be a fool’s errand as you start over-thinking situations and worrying about perception.

Boxer Rocky Marciano once said the best way to go into a bout was to forget all about the other fellow until you face him in the ring and the bell sounds for the fight.” Scotland won’t be worried about Argentina talking about how vital this game is because it is to be expected. Scotland have to think that as well. The key, however, is to accept that the preparation is over and that it is too late to change anything now. You can only pick a team fit for purpose and send them out on the field.

Scotland have certainly picked a team for a purpose.

I love seeing teams named like this:  Scotland: C Paterson; M Evans, N De Luca, G Morrison, S Lamont; R Jackson, R Lawson (capt); A Jacobsen, R Ford, G Cross, R Gray, J Hamilton, A Strokosch, J Barclay, K Brown. Replacements: D Hall, A Dickinson, N Hines, R Vernon, M Blair, D Parks, S Danielli.

No pomp. No preamble. Just a list of names that have a job to do.

Looking between the commas, though, there is a greater definition of job here. I get a sense that by picking a string of Jackson-Morrison-De Luca we ensure that captain Lawson has a huge day of cajoling the pack ahead of him. Something he thrives with. We clearly expect a forward battle –that’s why we have picked our most abrasive back row with Strokosch –and the collision area could be seen around the middle of the park a bit more whilst both teams size each other up.

The reason that the midfield selections ensure this is because there is not much tactical kicking in these three. Jackson likes to run towards 12, Morrison will attract a few contacts and De Luca will be expected to interest the cover before sliding a pass to Sean Lamont.

Behind these three we will be expecting to counter attack. With or without Contepomi we know Argentina like to rain down kicks to compete for and so by having blunt force with a midfield full of running we can let Evans, Lamont and Paterson focus on countering through broken play. It is surprising that Danielli is chosen to bench for such a style, rather that Rory Lamont, but I like the idea.

This tactic could prove inspired. It could create more tries than we could get from constant one out runners and trundling carries from Ford, Hamilton and Jacobsen. Perhaps, though, like the wide array of words used by Argentina these forward runs and midfield darts will distract our opposition long enough to let our back three counter.

However the game goes though, be it the constant abrasive forward hits paying off or the counter attack surprising the cover defence, the time for talking is almost over.



A Wordpress cake, from the Leafwalk bakery, covered in Motion icing, served on a Dreamhost plate, with 77 sprinkles in 2.322 seconds.